Comparison of continuous-time random walk and fractional order calculus models in characterizing breast lesions using histogram analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the diagnostic performance of different mathematical models for DWI and explore whether parameters reflecting spatial and temporal heterogeneity can demonstrate better diagnostic accuracy than the diffusion coefficient parameter in distinguishing benign and malignant breast lesions, using whole-tumor histogram analysis. METHODS: This retrospective study was approved by the institutional ethics committee and included 104 malignant and 42 benign cases. All patients underwent breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with a 3.0 T MR scanner using the simultaneous multi-slice (SMS) readout-segment ed echo-planar imaging (rs-EPI). Histogram metrics of Mono- apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), CTRW, and FROC-derived parameters were compared between benign and malignant breast lesions, and the diagnostic performance of each diffusion parameter was evaluated. Statistical analysis was performed using Mann-Whitney U test and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. RESULTS: The DFROC-median exhibited the highest AUC for distinguishing benign and malignant breast lesions (AUC = 0.965). The temporal heterogeneity parameter αCTRW-median generated a statistically higher AUC compared to the spatial heterogeneity parameter ßCTRW-median (AUC = 0.850 and 0.741, respectively; p = 0.047). Finally, the combination of median values of CTRW parameters displayed a slightly higher AUC than that of FROC parameters, with no significant difference however (AUC = 0.971 and 0.965, respectively; p = 0.172). CONCLUSIONS: The diffusion coefficient parameter exhibited superior diagnostic performance in distinguishing breast lesions when compared to the temporal and spatial heterogeneity parameters.

Role of combined clinical-radiomics model based on contrast-enhanced MRI in predicting the malignancy of breast non-mass enhancements without an additional diffusion-weighted imaging sequence.

Background: In our previous study, we developed a combined diagnostic model based on time-intensity curve (TIC) types and radiomics signature on contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE-MRI) for non-mass enhancement (NME). The model had a high diagnostic ability for differentiation without the additional diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) sequence. In this study, we aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of the combined clinical-radiomics model based on CE-MRI and DWI in discriminating Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) 4 NME breast lesions, ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), and invasive carcinoma. Methods: This retrospective study enrolled 364 NME lesions (343 patients). Of these, 183 malignant and 84 benign breast lesions classified as BI-RADS 4 NMEs by the initial diagnosis were reclassified based on the combined clinical-radiomics model and DWI, respectively. The nomogram score (NS) values for malignancy risk derived from the combined clinical-radiomics model and the minimal apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values from DWI were calculated and compared. The percentage of false positives were estimated in comparison with the original classification. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to determine the diagnostic value of the NS and minimal ADC values in distinguishing benign and malignant lesions, DCIS, and invasive breast carcinoma. An ablation experiment was used to test the value of the additional DWI sequence. Results: The diagnostic value of the NS values [area under curve (AUC) =0.843; 95% CI: 0.789-0.896] for discriminating the 267 NME breast lesions categorized as BI-RADS 4 was significantly higher than the minimal ADC values (AUC =0.662; 95% CI: 0.590-0.735). The NS values showed higher sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy compared with the minimal ADC values (sensitivity: 80.3% vs. 65.6%; specificity: 79.8% vs. 65.5%; accuracy: 80.1% vs. 65.5%). The NS values and minimal ADC values did not achieve high diagnostic accuracy in discriminating between DCIS and invasive cancer. However, the diagnostic performance of the combined NS-ADC model (AUC =0.731; 95% CI: 0.655-0.806) was higher than that of the NS values alone (P=0.008) and comparable to that of the minimal ADC values (P=0.440). Conclusions: The combined clinical-radiomics model based on CE-MRI could improve the diagnostic performance in discriminating the BI-RADS 4 NME lesions without an additional DWI sequence. However, DWI may improve the diagnostic performance in discriminating DCIS from invasive cancer.

Histogram analysis of multi-model high-resolution diffusion-weighted MRI in breast cancer: correlations with molecular prognostic factors and subtypes.

Objective: To investigate the correlations between quantitative diffusion parameters and prognostic factors and molecular subtypes of breast cancer, based on a single fast high-resolution diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) sequence with mono-exponential (Mono), intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM), diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) models. Materials and Methods: A total of 143 patients with histopathologically verified breast cancer were included in this retrospective study. The multi-model DWI-derived parameters were quantitatively measured, including Mono-ADC, IVIM-D, IVIM-D*, IVIM-f, DKI-Dapp, and DKI-Kapp. In addition, the morphologic characteristics of the lesions (shape, margin, and internal signal characteristics) were visually assessed on DWI images. Next, Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, Mann-Whitney U test, Spearman's rank correlation, logistic regression, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and Chi-squared test were utilized for statistical evaluations. Results: The histogram metrics of Mono-ADC, IVIM-D, DKI-Dapp, and DKI-Kapp were significantly different between estrogen receptor (ER)-positive vs. ER-negative groups, progesterone receptor (PR)-positive vs. PR-negative groups, Luminal vs. non-Luminal subtypes, and human epidermal receptor factor-2 (HER2)-positive vs. non-HER2-positive subtypes. The histogram metrics of Mono-ADC, DKI-Dapp, and DKI-Kapp were also significantly different between triple-negative (TN) vs. non-TN subtypes. The ROC analysis revealed that the area under the curve considerably improved when the three diffusion models were combined compared with every single model, except for distinguishing lymph node metastasis (LNM) status. For the morphologic characteristics of the tumor, the margin showed substantial differences between ER-positive and ER-negative groups. Conclusions: Quantitative multi-model analysis of DWI showed improved diagnostic performance for determining the prognostic factors and molecular subtypes of breast lesions. The morphologic characteristics obtained from high-resolution DWI can be identifying ER statuses of breast cancer.

Primary angiosarcoma of the breast: Two case reports and brief review of the literature.

Angiosarcoma is a rare but very aggressive tumor. It occurs in all organs of the body, and approximately 8% of all angiosarcomas arise in the breast. We reported 2 cases of primary breast angiosarcomas in young women. The 2 patients showed similar clinical features, but were quite different in dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. The 2 patients were treated with mastectomy and axillary sentinel lymph node dissection and confirmed by post-operative pathological test. We suggested that dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging was the most helpful imaging tool in the diagnosis and pre-operative evaluation of the breast angiosarcoma.

Contrasts Between Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MR in Diagnosing Malignancies of Breast Nonmass Enhancement Lesions Based on Morphologic Assessment.

BACKGROUND: Nonmass enhancement (NME) breast lesions are considered to be the leading cause of unnecessary biopsies. Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) or dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) sequences are typically used to differentiate between benign and malignant NMEs. It is important to know which one is more effective and reliable. PURPOSE: To compare the diagnostic performance of DCE curves and DWI in discriminating benign and malignant NME lesions on the basis of morphologic characteristics assessment on contrast-enhanced (CE)-MRI images. STUDY TYPE: Retrospective. SUBJECTS: A total of 180 patients with 184 lesions in the training cohort and 75 patients with 77 lesions in the validation cohort with pathological results. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: A 3.0 T/multi-b-value DWI (b values = 0, 50, 1000, and 2000 sec/mm2 ) and time-resolved angiography with stochastic trajectories and volume-interpolated breath-hold examination (TWIST-VIBE) sequence. ASSESSMENT: In the training cohort, a diagnostic model for morphology based on the distribution and internal enhancement characteristics was first constructed. The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) model (ADC + morphology) and the time-intensity curves (TIC) model (TIC + morphology) were then established using binary logistic regression with pathological results as the reference standard. Both models were compared for sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) in the training and the validation cohort. STATISTICAL TESTS: Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and two-sample t-tests/Mann-Whitney U-test/Chi-square test were performed. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: For the TIC/ADC model in the training cohort, sensitivities were 0.924/0.814, specificities were 0.615/0.615, and AUCs were 0.811 (95%, 0.727, 0.894)/0.769 (95%, 0.681, 0.856). The AUC of the TIC-ADC combined model was significantly higher than ADC model alone, while comparable with the TIC model (P = 0.494). In the validation cohort, the AUCs of TIC/ADC model were 0.799/0.635. DATA CONCLUSION: Based on the morphologic analyses, the performance of the TIC model was found to be superior than the ADC model for differentiating between benign and malignant NME lesions. EVIDENCE LEVEL: 4. TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.

Assessment of Prognostic Factors and Molecular Subtypes of Breast Cancer With a Continuous-Time Random-Walk MR Diffusion Model: Using Whole Tumor Histogram Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The continuous-time random-walk (CTRW) diffusion model to evaluate breast cancer prognosis is rarely reported. PURPOSE: To investigate the correlations between apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and CTRW-specific parameters with prognostic factors and molecular subtypes of breast cancer. STUDY TYPE: Retrospective. POPULATION: One hundred fifty-seven women (median age, 50 years; range, 26-81 years) with histopathology-confirmed breast cancer. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: Simultaneous multi-slice readout-segmented echo-planar imaging at 3.0T. ASSESSMENT: The histogram metrics of ADC, anomalous diffusion coefficient (D), temporal diffusion heterogeneity (α), and spatial diffusion heterogeneity (ß) were calculated for whole-tumor volume. Associations between histogram metrics and prognostic factors (estrogen receptor [ER], progesterone receptor [PR], human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 [HER2], and Ki-67 proliferation index), axillary lymph node metastasis (ALNM), and tumor grade were assessed. The performance of histogram metrics, both alone and in combination, for differentiating molecular subtypes (HER2-positive, Luminal or triple negative) was also assessed. STATISTICAL TESTS: Comparisons were made using Mann-Whitney test between different prognostic factor statuses and molecular subtypes. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to assess the performance of mean and median histogram metrics in differentiating the molecular subtypes. A P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The histogram metrics of ADC, D, and α differed significantly between ER-positive and ER-negative status, and between PR-positive and PR-negative status. The histogram metrics of ADC, D, α, and ß were also significantly different between the HER2-positive and HER2-negative subgroups, and between ALNM-positive and ALNM-negative subgroups. The histogram metrics of α and ß significantly differed between high and low Ki-67 proliferation subgroups, and between histological grade subgroups. The combination of αmean and ßmean achieved the highest performance (AUC = 0.702) to discriminate the Luminal and HER2-positive subtypes. DATA CONCLUSION: Whole-tumor histogram analysis of the CTRW model has potential to provide additional information on the prognosis and intrinsic subtyping classification of breast cancer. EVIDENCE LEVEL: 4 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.

Quantitative Assessment of Restriction Spectrum MR Imaging for the Diagnosis of Breast Cancer and Association With Prognostic Factors.

BACKGROUND: Restriction spectrum imaging (RSI) is an advanced quantitative diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) technique to assess breast cancer. PURPOSE: To investigate the ability of RSI to differentiate the benign and malignant breast lesions and the association with prognostic factors of breast cancer. STUDY TYPE: Retrospective. POPULATION: Seventy women (mean age, 49.6 ± 12.3 years) with 56 malignant and 19 benign breast lesions. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 3-T; RSI-based DWI sequence with echo-planar imaging technique. ASSESSMENT: The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and RSI parameters (restricted diffusion f1 , hindered diffusion f2 , free diffusion f3 , and signal fractions f1 f2 ) were calculated by two readers for the whole lesion volume and compared between the benign and malignant groups and the subgroups with different statuses of prognostic factors in breast cancer. STATISTICAL TESTS: Mann-Whitney U test or Student's t-test was applied to compare the quantitative parameters between the different groups. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to assess readers' reproducibility. Binary logistic regression was used to combine parameters. Area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to evaluate the diagnostic performance of parameters to distinguish benign from malignant breast lesions. A P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Malignant breast lesions showed significantly lower ADC and f3 values, and significantly higher f1 and f1 f2 values than the benign lesions, with AUC of 0.951, 0.877, 0.868, and 0.860, respectively. When RSI-derived parameters and ADC were combined, the diagnostic performance was superior to either single parameter (AUC = 0.973). The f3 value was significantly differed between estrogen receptor (ER)-positive and ER-negative tumors. The ADC, f1 , f3 , and f1 f2 values were significantly different progesterone receptor (PR)-positive and PR-negative status. DATA CONCLUSION: The RSI-derived parameters (f1 , f3 , and f1 f2 ) may facilitate the differential diagnosis between benign and malignant breast lesions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.

Diagnostic value of multi-model high-resolution diffusion-weighted MR imaging in breast lesions: Based on simultaneous multi-slice readout-segmented echo-planar imaging.

PURPOSE: To investigate the diagnostic value of multi-model high-resolution diffusion-weighted MR imaging (DWI) in breast lesions, with a comparison of simultaneous multi-slice readout-segmented echo-planar imaging (SMS rs-EPI) and single-shot EPI (ss-EPI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study was approved by the institutional ethics committee and included 120 patients with 122 breast lesions (25 benign and 97 malignant). All patients underwent breast DWI with multi-b values (0, 50, 100, 200, 400, 800, 1200, and 2000 s/mm2) based on both SMS rs-EPI and ss-EPI on a 3.0 T MR scanner. Quantitative DWI-derived parameters including ADC, MK, MD, D, D*, and f were calculated based on mono-exponential (Mono), intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM), diffusion kurtosis (DKI) models. Meanwhile, both DWI sequences were qualitatively evaluated with respect to overall image quality, lesion conspicuity, image artifact, geometric distortion, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and lesion contrast. The differences in DW-derived parameters, image quality, and diagnostic performance were statistically compared between SMS rs-EPI and ss-EPI groups. RESULTS: The SMS rs-EPI produced higher Contrast, CNR and lower SNR than ss-EPI (p < 0.01). The image quality of SMS rs-EPI was superior to ss-EPI either in subjective or objective evaluation. There was no significant difference between the SMS rs-EPI and ss-EPI for either MD or the D* (p > 0.05). However, the MK and f between the two sequences showed significant differences (p < 0.05). Spearman's correlation coefficient displayed good linear correlation for MK values (r = 0.73, 95% CI 0.617-0.857), MD values (r = 0.88, 95% CI 0.814-0.926), ADC values (r = 0.93, 95% CI 0.869-0.948) and D values (r = 0.93, 95% CI 0.856-0.948) between SMS rs-EPI and ss-EPI. Spearman's correlation coefficient for f values (r = 0.25, 95% CI 0.226-0.559) and D* values (r = 0.22, 95% CI 0.025-0.348) were fair and no correlation between the two sequences. MK values have the highest diagnostic value in differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions. CONCLUSIONS: High-resolution multi-model DWI based on SMS rs-EPI technique can provide superior image quality and lesion characterization, with comparable diagnostic performance as compared with ss-EPI DWI in differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions. Of different DWI-derived parameters, MK values showed the best diagnostic performance.

Structure and Properties of Organogels Prepared from Rapeseed Oil with Stigmasterol.

This work used the natural ingredient stigmasterol as an oleogelator to explore the effect of concentration on the properties of organogels. Organogels based on rapeseed oil were investigated using various techniques (oil binding capacity, rheology, polarized light microscopy, X-ray diffraction, and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy) to better understand their physical and microscopic properties. Results showed that stigmasterol was an efficient and thermoreversible oleogelator, capable of structuring rapeseed oil at a stigmasterol concentration as low as 2% with a gelation temperature of 5 °C. The oil binding capacity values of organogels increased to 99.74% as the concentration of stigmasterol was increased to 6%. The rheological properties revealed that organogels prepared with stigmasterol were a pseudoplastic fluid with non-covalent physical crosslinking, and the G' of the organogels did not change with the frequency of scanning increased, showing the characteristics of strong gel. The microscopic properties and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy showed that stigmasterol formed rod-like crystals through the self-assembly of intermolecular hydrogen bonds, fixing rapeseed oil in its three-dimensional structure to form organogels. Therefore, stigmasterol can be considered as a good organogelator. It is expected to be widely used in food, medicine, and other biological-related fields.

Non-Mass Enhancements on DCE-MRI: Development and Validation of a Radiomics-Based Signature for Breast Cancer Diagnoses.

PURPOSE: We aimed to assess the additional value of a radiomics-based signature for distinguishing between benign and malignant non-mass enhancement lesions (NMEs) on dynamic contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging (breast DCE-MRI). METHODS: In this retrospective study, 232 patients with 247 histopathologically confirmed NMEs (malignant: 191; benign: 56) were enrolled from December 2017 to October 2020 as a primary cohort to develop the discriminative models. Radiomic features were extracted from one post-contrast phase (around 90s after contrast injection) of breast DCE-MRI images. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression model was adapted to select features and construct the radiomics-based signature. Based on clinical and routine MR features, radiomics features, and combined information, three discriminative models were built using multivariable logistic regression analyses. In addition, an independent cohort of 72 patients with 72 NMEs (malignant: 50; benign: 22) was collected from November 2020 to April 2021 for the validation of the three discriminative models. Finally, the combined model was assessed using nomogram and decision curve analyses. RESULTS: The routine MR model with two selected features of the time-intensity curve (TIC) type and MR-reported axillary lymph node (ALN) status showed a high sensitivity of 0.942 (95%CI, 0.906 - 0.974) and low specificity of 0.589 (95%CI, 0.464 - 0.714). The radiomics model with six selected features was significantly correlated with malignancy (P<0.001 for both primary and validation cohorts). Finally, the individual combined model, which contained factors including TIC types and radiomics signatures, showed good discrimination, with an acceptable sensitivity of 0.869 (95%CI, 0.816 to 0.916), improved specificity of 0.839 (95%CI, 0.750 to 0.929). The nomogram was applied to the validation cohort, reaching good discrimination, with a sensitivity of 0.820 (95%CI, 0.700 to 0.920), specificity of 0.864 (95%CI,0.682 to 1.000). The combined model was clinically helpful, as demonstrated by decision curve analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Our study added radiomics signatures into a conventional clinical model and developed a radiomics nomogram including radiomics signatures and TIC types. This radiomics model could be used to differentiate benign from malignant NMEs in patients with suspicious lesions on breast MRI.